Graphics
April 15th, 2008, 03:24 PM
http://www.connpost.com/breakingnews/ci_8825476
"In Connecticut we have them [bike lanes] in some places, but for the majority we don't," Guerrera said. "The DOT is starting to use them in more and more projects, but if we require them, in the long run, it'll be better for the state."
The bill would clarify the definition of a "safe distance" when a car passes a bike, by setting a minimum 3-foot buffer. While the DOT has pedestrian and bike access in its master plan, it could also require future expressway projects to include bike and walk paths.
great news i think (even if i AM on my way to texas) :p
"In Connecticut we have them [bike lanes] in some places, but for the majority we don't," Guerrera said. "The DOT is starting to use them in more and more projects, but if we require them, in the long run, it'll be better for the state."
The bill would clarify the definition of a "safe distance" when a car passes a bike, by setting a minimum 3-foot buffer. While the DOT has pedestrian and bike access in its master plan, it could also require future expressway projects to include bike and walk paths.
great news i think (even if i AM on my way to texas) :p